Search Results for "New Family Pension Scheme"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses BSNL's Challenge to CAT Order on Pension Revision for Pre-2007 Retirees. Court upholds applicability of BSNL Pension Rules, 2007 to employees who retired before 01.10.2007, rejecting the argument that pension revision is limited to post-2007 retirees.

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), and its officers challenging the order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petitions for Provident Fund Pensionary Benefits — EPF Scheme 1995. Employer's Default in Contribution Does Not Bar Employees' Entitlement to Pension Under Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by retired employees seeking pensionary benefits under the Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Claim for Samman Pension under Freedom Fighter Pension Scheme, 1972 rejected as petitioner failed to prove participation in Hyderabad Liberation Movement with credible documentary evidence.

The petitioner, Shri Ramkishan s/o. Narhari Sangewar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4th August 2004 rejecting his claim for Samman...