Search Results for "Mining Leases"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "Mining Leases"

136 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 136 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Royalty on Run-of-Mine Coal for Period Prior to Insertion of Rule 64B and 64C in Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. Processed or Beneficiated Coal Attracts Royalty After Effective Date of Notification Dated 25th September, 2000.

31 Jul 2026

The dispute involved multiple appeals before the Supreme Court arising out of conflicting interpretations of the stage at which royalty becomes payabl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Liability for Supplementary Award Rests with Original Beneficiary, Not Transferee Company. Scheme of Arrangement Under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956 Does Not Transfer Contingent Liabilities of Pending Acquisition Proceedings.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd. against the order of the Himachal Pradesh High Court dated 12.07.2022. The Hi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Revision Application and Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Lack of Evidence of Conspiracy and Dishonest Intention. Applicant/Accused No. 6 discharged from offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 511, 468, 471 IPC and Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as no prima facie case made out against him.

27 Jun 2023

The applicant, Dr. Vidyasagar Garg, was accused No. 6 in Special CBI Case No. 1 of 2014 arising out of FIR No. RC 219 2012(E) 0006 registered on 03.07...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2016 — Time Limit for Obtaining Environmental Clearance Upheld. Rule 8-B requiring quarry lease holders to obtain environmental clearance within 24 months from commencement of amendment rules is held to be reasonable and not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution.

12 Mar 2021

The petitioners, holders of quarry leases for minor minerals, challenged the validity of Rule 8-B of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reduction of Mining Lease Area — State Government Cannot Unilaterally Reduce Lease Area Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957. The court quashed the order reducing the lease area from 10.24 acres to 2.47 hectares and directed fresh consideration in accordance with law.

23 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s Aane Mines and Minerals, a partnership firm, applied for a mining lease for iron ore and manganese on 1st August 2006 under Rule 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trial Court Order Refusing Deletion of Parties in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Misjoinder of Parties and Causes of Action Not Established. The court held that the presence of defendants 6 to 8 was necessary for complete adjudication of the dispute relating to partnership property and family settlement under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

25 Oct 2013

The petitioners, defendants 1 to 4 in Special Civil Suit No. 2 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the trial court's order dated 18 April 2012,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Compounding Fee Demand Under Section 96(4) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 for Want of Prior Conversion of Patta Land. Quarrying Activity Commenced When Law Did Not Require Conversion as per Shakeel Pasha v. N. Sivasailam, Hence No Violation of Section 95.

2 Aug 2013

The petitioner, a mineral company holding three quarrying licences granted in 2000 and 2002 for extraction of pink granite on patta agricultural lands...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)