Search Results for "Manufacturer's Address"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Return to Paper Ballots or 100% VVPAT Counting in Elections. Court Upholds EVMs with VVPAT as Sufficiently Transparent and Reliable, Rejects Allegations of Manipulation Without Evidence.

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by the Association for Democratic Reforms and others seeking various directions regarding ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of Process Issued Under Section 138 NI Act Against Directors Due to Insolvency Moratorium and Insufficient Averments. Complaint Did Not Specify Role of Each Director and Cheques Were Presented After Moratorium Order Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Background: Two criminal applications under Section 482 CrPC were filed by nine directors of M/s. Amtek Auto Ltd. seeking quashing of process orders i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case for Technical Drawings of Flash Lights. Court holds that copyright subsists in technical drawings under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and that reproduction in a three-dimensional form constitutes infringement.

The plaintiff, Photoquip India Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Delhi Photo Store and Sunlight Industries, alleging that the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Excise Duty Rate on Cranes — Enacted Statute Prevails Over Discrepancy in Bill Versions. Rate of Duty Under Heading 84.26 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 is 15% Ad Valorem, Not 12% as Claimed by Manufacturer.

The petitioner, M/s. Garlick Engineering, a manufacturer of cranes, filed a writ petition challenging the rate of central excise duty applicable to cr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heir for Company's Central Excise Dues Without Proper Adjudication. Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed on Legal Representative Without Determining Liability Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, Vandana Bidyut Chaterjee, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging various notices and communi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Conditions Requiring Work Experience and Solvency Certificate as Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Conditions held contrary to CPWD Works Manual, 2003 and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, James Electricals, a sole proprietorship concern of Mr. James Andrade, is a Class I electrical contractor enlisted with the respondent...