Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Single Isolated Incident Without Satisfying 'Disturbed Area' Condition Under Section 2(a-1) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Siddant alias Siddharth Sanjay Marathe, challenged a detention order dated 7 February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Lack of Proximate Link Between In-Custody Offences and Breach of Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Activities While in Custody Cannot Form Basis for Preventive Detention Under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, father of the detenu Pruthviraj Vilas Aawale, challenged the detention order dated 16 December 2022 passed by the District Magistrate,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay — Preventive Detention Invalidated as Live Link Between Grounds and Detention Purpose Broken

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Zainul Abbas Shabbir Rajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Orders and In-camera Statements Renders Detention Invalid

The petitioner, Shamim Makmood Khan, mother of detenu Firoj @ Babbali Maqbul Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 16 October 2019 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...