Search Results for "MHADA Act"

274 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Remand Authority in Mumbai Slum Redevelopment Dispute. Key Decision on Appellate Powers and Arbitral Award Validity in Complex Multi-Party Case

The Supreme Court is addressing appeals concerning a High Court judgment on a slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The case involves various parties,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Decree on Admission in Lease Dispute Over Overlapping Land Allotments. Order XII Rule 6 CPC Decree Set Aside as Lease Deeds Pertained to Different Survey Numbers and No Clear Admission of Liability Was Made.

The appeal arose from an order and judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court granting a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Suit Challenging MHADA Notice. The court held that the petitioner, a company, was not a necessary or proper party to the suit between tenants and MHADA and had no right to be impleaded.

The petitioner, Orbit Corporate Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 9-2-2012 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...