Search Results for "Interest Levy"

756 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 756 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Assistant PF Commissioner Due to Delay and Laches in Challenging EPF Damages Order. Petition filed nearly three years after impugned order without explanation for delay, and no merit found in challenge to damages calculation under Para 32A of EPF Scheme, 1952.

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (petitioner) filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Contribution Order for Non-Application of Mind in Maharashtra Public Trust Act Case — State Failed to Consider Mandatory Factors Under Section 58(4) While Fixing 2% Rate.

The petitioner, Dadimay Medical Memorial Research Trust, a public trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950, challenged an order d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rules Against Stamp Duty on Amalgamation Orders Under Companies Act, 1956. Court Order Sanctioning Scheme of Amalgamation Is Not a Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

The case involved a reference under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, arising from a scheme of amalgamation between Reliance Industries Limited (transferee)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Fees on Transporters and Traders Under Essential Commodities Act for Maintenance of Public Distribution System. The court held that the levy under Section 3(3)(f) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 is a valid regulatory fee and not a tax.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the levy of fees on transporters and traders under the Maharashtra Es...