Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946"

187 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 187 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees of National Textile Corporation Ltd. — Petitioners Not Employees of NTC Ltd. as They Were Appointed by Contractors and No Employer-Employee Relationship Established.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shilpa S. Chandankar and Priyanka Pradeep Chavan against the National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Interlocutory Order in Domestic Enquiry — Holds That Item 1 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Every Interlocutory Order Passed by Enquiry Officer

The petitioner, Vinod Pattar, a workman employed by M/s. EIH Ltd. (the Oberoi Hotel), challenged an interlocutory order dated 21/12/2021 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Order of Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages under BIR Act. Court Upholds Power of Labour Court to Award Lesser Back Wages Without Section 11A Equivalent and Confirms Findings on Theft Charge as Not Perverse.

The dispute originated from the dismissal of five jamadars by Kohinoor Mills (a unit of National Textile Corporation) on charges of theft and miscondu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Probationer Teacher. Rule 16(2) of MEPS Rules Mandates Notice Before Concluding Voluntary Abandonment of Employment.

The petitioner, Magasvargiya Shikshan Sanstha, a school management, challenged the judgment and order dated 24.9.2015 of the School Tribunal, Aurangab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Enhanced Retirement Age and Arrears Under Settlement. Industrial Court's dismissal of complaint set aside; petitioners entitled to retirement at 58 years and arrears from 01.07.2008.

The petitioners, five individuals who were members of the Bosch Chassis Kamgar Sanghatana (respondent no.2 union), filed a writ petition before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Training Under Industrial Disputes Act — Trainee Not a Workman Under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Training Agreement Did Not Create Employer-Employee Relationship, Hence No Retrenchment.

The petitioner, Nilesh Shivaji Sapkar, was initially appointed by respondent no.4, Volkswagen India Private Limited, for a fixed period of six months ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...