Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act"

394 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 394 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Rejection of Permanency Claim - Government Resolution for Absorption of Daily Wage Workers Must Be Liberally Constructed. The court directed the Respondent to grant permanency to the Petitioner with effect from 1 June 2012 under the Government Resolution dated 16 October 2012.

5 Jan 2024

The Petitioner, a daily wage worker engaged by the Respondent-Corporation (fully owned by the Forest Department of Maharashtra) since 1999, sought abs...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses State Government's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency Benefits to Horticultural Workers under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that employees engaged in preparing fruit plants, tree plants, vegetable plants, and plantation activity for over 240 days are entitled to permanency benefits.

4 Nov 2023

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by the State Government of Maharashtra challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Kolhapur, date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

25 Jun 2021

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Challenging Industrial Court's Directions for Regularization of Workers. Industrial Court's findings on completion of 240 days and unfair labour practices upheld, with directions to send proposals for permanency.

17 Jul 2019

The petitioner, the Municipal Council of Kalamb, filed three writ petitions challenging identical judgments dated 22/08/2017 passed by the Industrial ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court's Grant of Permanency to Intermittent Workers — Continuous Service Inferred Despite Breaks Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that workmen who worked intermittently with breaks of 12 months to 3 years had continuous service, rejecting the employer's petition.

6 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Kinetic Engineering Ltd., challenged the judgments of the Industrial Court that allowed ULP complaints filed by the respondents (Barku...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Sanitation Worker Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Model Standing Orders under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 held inapplicable to municipal hospital as it is not an industrial establishment.

22 Jun 2018

The petitioner, a sanitation worker at Talera Hospital, Chinchwad, filed a complaint under Items 5, 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Management's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Suspension and Deduction Upheld. Disciplinary action and voluntary deduction under settlement were valid, not constituting unfair labour practice under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Vivekanand Rugnalaya, Latur, a hospital management, challenged the judgment and order dated 13/11/2013 of the Industrial Court, Latur,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workers' Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Against Textile Mill. Held that the Industrial Court's finding of no unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act was based on evidence and not perverse.

5 Apr 2006

The petitioners, workers employed by respondent no. 1 (Shri Ram Mills), filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Setting Aside Reinstatement and Backwages Due to Limitation Under Section 42(4) of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Approach Notice Filed Beyond Stipulated Period Without Sufficient Cause, Hence Labour Court's Order Set Aside.

8 Apr 2005

The petitioner, Pedru Mozes Fernandes, was a permanent workman employed as a boiler serviceman at Tata Mills from 1st March 1973. He worked continuous...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The court upheld the Industrial Court's finding that keeping workmen as temporaries for years constituted an unfair labour practice under Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

16 Mar 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Century Rayon (a division of Century Textiles & Industries Ltd.) challenging an order of the Industr...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)