Search Results for "Inam land"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Inam land"

126 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 126 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Suit Based on Adverse Possession — High Court's Reversal in Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law Set Aside. Concurrent Findings of Possession and Ouster by Trial Court and First Appellate Court Restored.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute pertains to a property measuring 1 acre and 18¼ guntas in Sy. No.1/4 originally owned by Thimmadasappa. He executed a registered sale dee...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Prior Partition Based on Unequal Division and Subsequent Conduct. Court holds that unequal partition does not invalidate severance of joint status and that subsequent alienations of individual shares indicate acceptance of prior partition.

3 Mar 2025

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants against a decree for partition and separate possession granted by the First Appella...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Inam Land Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Cultivation Rights Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The court held that mutation entries do not confer title and that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to adjudicate disputed questions of fact.

16 Feb 2024

The petitioners, legal representatives of Nasiruddin (the original Inamdar of Dargha Khaja Mohjeebuddin, Kaij), challenged the orders of respondent No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell BDA Allotted Site Within Prohibited Period Held Unlawful. Court sets aside decree for specific performance as the agreement violated Rule 18(2) of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1972, which prohibited alienation for ten years.

18 Jan 2022

The case involves a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell a site allotted by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). The first defe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal for Suppression of Material Facts in Land Acquisition Dispute. Writ petitioner must disclose all relevant facts including prior civil suit and appeal; failure to do so disentitles equitable relief under Article 226.

26 Oct 2021

The case involves an appeal by the sons of M. Krishna Reddy against the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and others. The appellants claimed that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

7 May 2010

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Remand for Fixing Purchase Price Under Section 32H of Bombay Tenancy Act. Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Upheld as Tenancy Findings Had Attained Finality and Land Had Turned Rayatava Under Section 88.

17 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sidappa Padmanna Berad, a former Sanadi Inamdar, filed a writ petition challenging the appellate order of the Special Land Acquisition...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries in Revenue Records — Held That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Must Be Based on Lawful Possession or Title. Revenue Authorities Cannot Adjudicate Title Disputes and Must Respect Civil Court Decrees.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the petitioners, who are legal representatives of the original owners of agricultural lands in Korali, T...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)