Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in Tender Misconduct Case — Enquiry Vitiated by Violation of Natural Justice. Order under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act set aside for lack of fair opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and consider defence.

21 Sep 2017

The petitioner, Sau. Leena Ramesh Dongarwar, was the Sarpanch of Navegaon Bandh Gram Panchayat. She was removed from office by an order of the Deputy ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Quashes Disqualification of Grampanchayat Member under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act for Lack of Personal Hearing and Non-Exercise of Discretion. The Court held that a common order disqualifying 265 members without individual hearing violates natural justice, and the Collector must exercise discretion under Section 14(B) of the Act to consider the explanation for delay.

3 Jun 2019

The petitioner was elected as a member of Grampanchayat Mhapral in elections held on 23 April 2015. The Tahsildar, Mandangad, by letter dated 28 June ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch; Upholds Validity of Requisition Received by Peshkar. Peshkar, as Senior-Most Revenue Officer, Validly Received Notice Under Section 35 of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958, When Tahsildar on Leave Per Section 10(b) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

28 Jan 2013

The petitioner was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Borgaon, Tq. Palam. Respondents Nos. 3 to 8, being members of the seven-member panchayat, submitted a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Poll for Entire Division Upon Death of Candidate in Gram Panchayat Election. Rule 14-A of Bombay Gram Panchayat (Election) Rules, 1959 Mandates Countermanding of Poll for the Division, Not Just the Seat of Deceased Candidate.

10 Jul 2012

The petitioners, three candidates contesting for different seats (open, OBC woman, and Scheduled Caste) in division no. 3 of Badnapur Gram Panchayat, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes No Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Meeting Rule. Rule 17 of Bombay Village Panchayats (Meetings) Rules, 1959 Held Mandatory; Failure to Move and Second Motion Vitiates Proceedings.

10 Jan 2013

The dispute arose from a no confidence motion passed against the petitioner, who was the elected Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Minche, Taluka Hatkanangale...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Gram Panchayat Elections — Upholds Validity of Election Process Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Court holds that election of members of Gram Panchayat cannot be challenged after declaration of results except by an election petition under Section 15 of the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Letters Patent Appeals (LPA No.203 of 2011 and LPA No.204 of 2011) filed against the orders of a learned Single Judge of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch Under Section 14(1)(g) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. Sarpanch Disqualified for Taking Illegal Commercial Water Connection Without Sanction.

8 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Ramdas Dattaraya Khose, was an elected member and Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Padalidariya. Respondents 7 to 9 filed an application und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ward Formation of Grampanchayat Khandale Due to Lack of Merit and Delay. The court held that the delimitation process was conducted in accordance with the Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Formation of Wards) Rules, 2019 and the petitioners' objections were duly considered.

12 Jan 2021

The petitioners, Sopan Kishanrao Narwade and Maruti Laxman Narwade, residents of Khandale, Taluka - Shirur, District - Pune, filed a Writ Petition bef...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Grampanchayat Resolution for Non-Compliance with Section 15(2) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959. Petitioners failed to provide mandatory notice under Section 15(2) before filing suit, rendering the challenge to the resolution not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Ravindraprasad Avasthi, Parvatibai Dolas, and Santosh Divane, filed writ petitions challenging a resolution passed by the Grampanchay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Disqualification of Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Local Authorities Members Disqualification Act, 1986 — Disqualification Order Set Aside for Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Proper Application of Mind. The court held that the disqualification authority must apply its mind to the allegations and evidence, and pass a reasoned order; mere reproduction of complaint and absence of finding on voluntary giving up of membership renders the order invalid.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Ratnamala Ashokrao Shinde (Sarpanch) and Bandu Raghunath Panchlinge (Upa-Sarpanch) of Grampanchayat Palodi, were disqualified by the ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)