Search Results for "Employees' State Insurance"

548 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 548 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Despite Invalid Driving Licence Due to Lack of Causal Connection. Owner Not Required to Pay Compensation Where Insurer Fails to Prove That Licence Breach Caused Accident.

The case involves two appeals filed by the owner of a vehicle, Sri Vijayakumar, against the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Death of Workman in Motor Vehicle Accident Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court held that the Commissioner erred in computing compensation by not properly applying the multiplier and not awarding funeral expenses and penalty for delayed payment.

The appellant, Smt. Prema, wife of the deceased K.P. Hanumantharaju, filed an appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Thrown Out of Jeep Due to Rash Driving. Negligence of Driver Proved and Deceased Not a Gratuitous Passenger in a Goods Vehicle, Insurer Liable.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of a deceased 22-year-old man. On 22.12.2008, the deceased was travelling in a jeep o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institution Challenging Provident Fund Applicability. Establishment Not Exempt Under Section 16(1)(a) or (b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as It Uses Power and Employs More Than 20 Persons.

The appellant, M/s. Aniket College of Social Work, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Cinema Theatre in ESI Act Coverage Dispute — Employees of Contractor and Cycle Stand Not Counted for Threshold. Handbill Boys Held Not Employees Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act, 1948 as Work Not Incidental to Cinema Business.

The appellant, M/s. Natraj Cinema, a partnership firm running a cinema theatre in Nagpur, challenged an order dated 21.09.2005 passed by the Industria...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in ESI Contribution Dispute — Tailors Held Not Employees Under ESI Act. Relationship of employer and employee denied as tailors worked independently outside the shop premises, not under control or supervision of the establishment.

The appellant, Khadi Gramodyog Emporium, Gandhi Sagar, Nagpur, challenged an order dated 14.05.1985 passed by the Deputy Regional Director, Employees ...