Search Results for "Disclosure Obligations"

383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Plaint Must Contain Material Facts Constituting Complete Cause of Action; Mere Filing of Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff to Interim Relief.

The case involves an appeal against an order rejecting the plaint in a suit for specific performance. The appellants, who were members of an associati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Favor of Appellants in Commercial Suits Involving Secured Creditors. Appointment of receiver without notice and without considering secured creditors' rights under SARFAESI Act is unsustainable.

The judgment arises from two commercial appeals filed by Future Corporate Resources Pvt Ltd and Ojas Tradelease And Mall Management Pvt Ltd against or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Mandamus Against Village Panchayat for Non-Compliance with Section 4 RTI Act. Court Directs Proactive Disclosure of Information Within Three Months.

The petitioner, Roshan Luke Mathias, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court at Goa, seeking a writ of mandamus to compe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Order Rejecting Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Upheld. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Law Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (M/s New Shelter Enterprises and its proprietors) challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favor regarding the cancellation of tender acceptance and forfeiture of earnest money.

The appellant, Sunil Mantri Realty Limited, filed an appeal against the order dated 29.09.2009 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division...