Search Results for "Detenue Statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Detenue Statement"

114 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 114 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Compelling Necessity. Preventive detention set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's acquittal in the predicate offence and did not provide sufficient material to justify the subjective satisfaction of imminent threat.

7 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Kishor Laxman Kawale, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detenu's Right to Liberty Upheld as Detaining Authority Did Not Apply Mind to Necessity of Detention Over Criminal Prosecution.

30 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Bhosle, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3rd March 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, u...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act, 1981. Detention Order Issued Under Section 3 of the Act Against a 70-Year-Old for Alleged Dangerous Activities.

17 Apr 2025

The criminal writ petition arose from a preventive detention order issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

1 Oct 2024

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Proper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act set aside as detaining authority failed to verify in-camera statements and did not consider that the alleged incident was a public agitation.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Avinash @ Balu Atmaram More, challenged his detention order dated 07-06-2022 passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order Under National Security Act 1980 Due to Procedural Lapses in Considering Representation. The detention was found illegal as the authorities delayed considering the representation and failed to communicate the decision, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution and procedural safeguards under the National Security Act 1980.

29 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal challenging a detention order under the National Security Act 1980. The appellant, a hospital direc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PITNDPS Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Proximate Link. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and the order was passed mechanically without proper application of mind.

12 May 2020

The petitioner, Mr. Kenneth Jideofor, challenged a preventive detention order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail Not Considered. Failure to consider pending bail applications and absence of credible material linking detenu to public order disturbance renders detention order invalid under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981.

11 Dec 2019

The petitioner, Govindsing Papulsing Tak, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 February 2019 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Retraction of Statement and Bail Conditions Ignored, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

3 Jul 2015

The petitioner, son of the detenu Bittu Choith Harchandani, challenged a detention order dated 16.4.2015 passed by the second respondent under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation — Right to Make Effective Representation Violated Under Article 22(5) of Constitution. The court held that the failure to consider the detenu's representation expeditiously renders the continued detention illegal, emphasizing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

30 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Ashish Robert Felix, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)