Search Results for "Demolition and reconstruction"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorised Construction in Red Zone — Deemed Sanction Under Section 238(6) of Cantonments Act, 2006 Not Available Where Initial Construction Was Illegal and Application Was Not Validly Pursued.

The petitioner, Lekha Ali Shaikh, owned a plot of land in Dehu Road Cantonment, Pune. In 2009, she constructed a 750 sq.ft structure without obtaining...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Society's Section 9 Petition for Possession and Injunction Against Developer in Redevelopment Dispute. Court Holds That Disputed Questions of Title and Possession Cannot Be Decided in Summary Proceedings Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two competing petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Rajawadi Arunodaya Co-operative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Order in Rent Control Dispute — Tenant's Granddaughters Not Entitled to Protection Under Section 13 of Bombay Rent Act as Agreement for Re-induction Was Not Executed

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Ms. Puja Suresh Gentle and another (applicants) against Tata Housing Development Co. Ltd. and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Rent Control Suit — Petitioner Landlord Permitted to Add Details of Bonafide Requirement for Demolition and Reconstruction. Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Must Be Liberally Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, Ajit Narsinha Talekar, the landlord, filed a suit for possession against the respondents, Smt. Nirmala Wamanrao Kekade and others, und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Contempt Order Against Municipal Corporation for Breach of Undertaking in Unauthorized Construction Case. Court Holds That Breach of Undertaking Given to Court Attracts Penalty Under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC.

The respondent, Bhikanlal Nanakchand Sharma, owned a shop near Mulund Checknaka, LBS Road, Mulund West, Mumbai. He and other shopkeepers had carried o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition of Unauthorized Structure in Jira Galli. Notice Under Section 314 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 Held Valid as Structure Was on Street and No Prior Notice Required.

The appellant, Bashir Nazir Sayyed, was the original plaintiff who filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Bombay seeking a declaration that a notice ...