Search Results for "DNA Evidence"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Wife in Husband's Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nandhini, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, in SC No.18/2022 dated 26.10.2022 for the murder of h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Wife in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Nandhini, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pudukottai, for the murder of her husband under Section 302 IPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302, 120(B), 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeals were filed by accused No.1 (Harish) and accused No.3 (Lokesh @ Sathish) against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 25.04.2017 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Ashok Dhondiram Dhavale, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag for the murder of Leelabai and her daughter Manisha under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony of Prosecutrix and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as evidence of victim was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Mr. Sayyad Chand Agasapure, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section 376(2)(i)(n) of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff's Petition for DNA Test in Partition Suit — Order 26 Rule 10A CPC. The court held that a DNA test is permissible under Order 26 Rule 10A CPC to establish relationship when disputed in a partition suit.

The petitioner, Smt. D.N. Mangala, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 11.04.2017 passed ...