Search Results for "Customs and Central Excise Department"

540 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 540 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Duty Drawback Interest Case, Upholding High Court's Award of Interest for Delayed Refund. Clarificatory Circulars Under Exim Policy Have Retrospective Effect, Making Contractor Eligible for Duty Drawback and Interest Under Sections 27A and 75A of Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute arose from the respondent's claim for duty drawback under the deemed export scheme for civil construction work in the Koyna Hydro Electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case — Amendment to Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Held Not Retrospective. CESTAT order allowing respondent's appeal upheld as the retrospective amendment by Finance Act, 2010 did not apply to the period prior to its enactment.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Mumbai East Commissionerate against Larsen & Toubro Limited (HED) under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Release of Imported Container Without Payment of Full Rent and Demurrage for Re-export — Petitioner Not Liable for Charges After Customs Clearance Refusal Due to Misdeclaration

The petitioner, Sahaj Impex, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Commissioner of Customs Can Disagree with Inquiry Officer's Report Under CHA Licensing Regulations, 2004 — Full Bench resolves conflict on scope of disciplinary authority's power to differ from subordinate officer's findings.

The petitioner, M/s. Delta Logistics, a partnership firm, was a licensed Customs House Agent (CHA) under the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulations...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition in Customs Smuggling Case — CEGAT Order Upheld for Lack of Evidence. Confiscation of Foreign Currency Set Aside as Revenue Failed to Prove Smuggling or Fraudulent Procurement of Currency Declaration Form Under Customs Act, 1962.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excise Duty Paid on Exported Goods Under Mistake of Law — Rule 13 Export Bond Not Used. Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law is Recoverable and Limitation Under Section 11B Central Excise Act Does Not Apply to Mistake of Law Claims.

The petitioners, Tata SSL Ltd. and its director, exported consignments of Cold Rolled Sheets and Coils to Nepal by road. The goods were cleared from t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...