Search Results for "Child Welfare Committee jurisdiction"

153 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 153 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Juvenile in Heinous POCSO Case — Trial as Adult Upheld. Mental Capacity and Circumstances of Offence Justify Transfer Under Section 15 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 Despite Procedural Delays.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by Mustafa Kha: Jabbar Kha (CCL No.1) challenging the order of the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Medical Negligence Finding Against Hospital and Doctors for Failure to Conduct ROP Screening on Preterm Baby Leading to Blindness. Compensation Enhanced for Child's Total Blindness Due to Negligent Omission of Mandatory Retinopathy of Prematurity Check-Up.

The case arises from a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence against Maharaja Agrasen Hospital and its doctors for failing to conduct mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Termination of Pregnancy Beyond 20 Weeks Due to Severe Foetal Anomalies. Medical Board Confirms Substantial Risk of Serious Physical Handicap Under Section 3(2)(b) of Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.

The petitioner, a woman in her 27th week of pregnancy, filed a writ petition seeking permission for medical termination of pregnancy. She had undergon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Adoption Petition in Juvenile Justice Act Case Due to Mechanical Rejection by District Judge. District Judge Failed to Consider Merits and Call for Reports Under Section 41 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000.

The petitioners, Ashok Dinaji Ramteke and his wife Ujjwala, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 17.4.2014 passed by the learned District...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minority Scholarship Schemes as Constitutional — Schemes for Minority Communities Do Not Violate Article 14 or 15(1) as They Are Based on Backwardness and Not Religion Alone.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two public interest litigations challenging the constitutional validity of two scholarship schemes for minority comm...