Search Results for "Chargeable Expenditure"

244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Rental Income Classification Case. Rental income from leasing unsold units of a commercial complex constructed by a real estate developer is assessable as business income, not income from house property.

The case involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Raymond Limited's Appeals in Central Excise Cenvat Credit Dispute. Cenvat Credit of AED (T&TA) on Inputs Can Be Utilized for Payment of BED on Final Products.

The appellant, Raymond Limited, is a company manufacturing blankets from woollen fibres. The blankets attract only Basic Excise Duty (BED) and not Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reopening Case — Notice Under Section 148 Quashed as Beyond Four Years Without Failure to Disclose. Reopening of Assessment Based on Change of Opinion Held Invalid Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, a company engaged in providing audiovisual television software, films, events, and related activiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material Beyond Four Years. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as There Was No Failure to Disclose Material Facts and No New Tangible Material.

The petitioner, Multiscreen Media Private Limited, a company engaged in providing audiovisual television software and related activities, filed return...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Tax Treatment of Compensation for Partial Termination of Selling Agency under Income Tax Act, 1922. The Court considered whether the sum received by the assessee for termination of agency rights outside Hyderabad State constituted a capital receipt or revenue receipt.

Background: The case involved the income tax assessment of the respondent, a registered firm carrying on business as selling agents and distributors o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...