Bombay High Court Rules on Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation and Others; Private Individuals Challenge Municipal Action Regarding Property in Malad West
30 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"
400 result(s) found
Found 400 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.
20 Mar 2023The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Reassessment Based on Capital Value Method Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Set Aside. Court Held That Reassessment Must Be Based on Fair Market Value as on 1st April 2010 and Not on Arbitrary Valuation.
29 Jul 2019The petitioners, residents of Narsinha Prasad Building and Narsinha Prasad Annex Building in Vile Parle (East), Mumbai, challenged the reassessment of...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition and Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Municipal Notice Case — Lack of Delegation of Powers Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. Notice Issued by Assistant Engineer Without Authorization from Commissioner Held Invalid Under Section 381 of the Act.
4 Jul 2019The petitioner, Kishanlal Udaylal Jain, through his power of attorney holder, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of ...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Tenants Challenging Demolition of Dilapidated Building. Court upholds eviction and demolition orders based on structural safety reports and compliance with statutory procedures under Section 354 of MMC Act, 1888 and Section 22 of MHADA Act, 1976.
23 Oct 2018The petitioners, residents of Building No. 12 in Mathuradas Colony, Kalina, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition order issued by t...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Redevelopment Proposals by Municipal Corporation. Court upholds Corporation's decision to reject proposals from vendor associations for redevelopment of municipal markets, finding no arbitrariness or violation of statutory provisions.
18 Sep 2014The Petitioners, being associations of licence vendors operating in various municipal markets established by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumb...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Impleadment of Landlord in Suit Against Demolition Notice Under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888. Landlord's Direct Interest in Property Makes Them a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
8 Feb 2010The petitioners, claiming to be owners of a gala in Dhiraj Pen Compound, Andheri, filed a suit challenging a demolition notice dated 17 September 2008...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Sheds by Municipal Corporation. Petitioner Failed to Produce Authorization Under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Hence Demolition Upheld.
28 Jun 2006The petitioner, M/s Sub Vijay International Pvt Ltd, owned property bearing CTS No. 11A in Aksa, Borivali, Mumbai. On 13th April 1999, the Deputy Cont...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Regularisation Applications for Stalls. Allotment of Pitches by Ward Officer Without Authority Does Not Create Legal Right.
14 Mar 2006The petitioner, Pravin s/o Govind Kalbhor, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11th Februa...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Is Six Months from Date of Dispossession, Not from Date of Knowledge. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC based on disputed facts regarding possession.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Ganpat Shankar Chougule, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking possession of a property under Section 6 of the Specific R...
- 77
