Search Results for "Bhaskaran case"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The appeal was filed by the complainant, Smt. G. Suma, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition in Commission Dispute. Debt Held Bona Fide Disputed Under Sections 433(e) and 434 of Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Total Sports & Entertainment India Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) and 434 of the Companies Act, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Sets Aside Return of Complaint on Jurisdictional Grounds. Presentation of Cheque for Collection and Issuance of Statutory Notice at Mumbai Confer Jurisdiction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, HDFC Bank Ltd. (formerly Centurion Bank of Punjab Ltd.), filed three criminal complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit, Restores Trial Court Decree. Plaintiff's Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale Deed Upheld Against Defendants' Claim of Adverse Possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiff, Selvaraj, against the judgment and decree of the Subordinate Court, Kuzhithurai, which rever...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Convicts Accused for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of N.I. Act stands unless rebutted by accused on preponderance of probabilities.

The appellant, Ashok Kumar, filed a complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, against t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...