Search Results for "Article 246"

488 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 488 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Constitutional Challenge to COFEPOSA Preventive Detention Powers for Foreign Exchange Violations. Petitioners Contend Absence of Penal Provisions Under FEMA Renders Section 3(1) Unconstitutional.

The writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed directly in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Hotels and Restaurants. Sub-clauses (ZZZZV) and (ZZZZW) of Section 65(105) of Finance Act, 1994 as amended by Finance Act, 2011 held to be within legislative competence of Parliament.

The case involves three writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the Karnataka High Court. The petitioners ...