Search Results for "workmen strike"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Reinstatement Without Back Wages for Daily Wage Workers in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Daily Wage Sweepers by Municipal Corporation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Back Wages Denied for Lack of Proof of Unemployment.

The petitioners, four daily wage sweepers (Safai Kamdars), were initially employed by the erstwhile Joshipura Nagarpalika in 1999. Upon merger of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Employer's Challenge to Industrial Court Award on Wage Revision and Education Allowance. Industrial Court's power to grant ad-hoc wage rise upheld, but education allowance award set aside for lack of evidence.

The petitioner, Ganesh Industries, an employer engaged in trading of Papad, challenged an Award dated 11 June 2019 passed by the Industrial Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contract Labourers in SAIL Mines Despite Finding Contract Genuine. High Court's Direction for Regularisation Consideration Under Para 125 of SAIL Judgment Affirmed, Back Wages Denied.

The case involves a long-standing industrial dispute between the Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL), a government undertaking, and the Ispat Khadan ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Not Liable for Wages During Lockout Period Due to Binding Settlement. Settlement Between Union and Employer Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act Precludes Claim for Wages for Period of No Work.

The appellant, M/s. Mehta Gem Tools Private Limited, challenged an order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No. 255...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging ESI Act Applicability to Bidi Manufacturer. Definition of Factory Under Section 2(12) ESI Act Includes Premises with Power-Aided Manufacturing Process, Home Workers Are Employees.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramchand Onkarlal Agarwal, a bidi manufacturer in Kamptee, Nagpur, challenged the applicability of the Employees' State Insurance...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...