Search Results for "western coalfields"

131 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 131 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires proof of financial loss caused by employee's misconduct, not merely disciplinary punishment of compulsory retirement.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal by Widow and Children, Upholding Mother's Share in Son's Provident Fund and Insurance Amounts. Mother of deceased employee held entitled to share as Class I heir under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, in provident fund, gratuity, and insurance proceeds.

The case involves a dispute over the distribution of provident fund, gratuity, and insurance amounts payable upon the death of Ramesh, who died on 09/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Employer's Petition to Deduct Gratuity for Misconduct Causing Pecuniary Loss Under Section 4(6)(a) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Disciplinary Order Not Challenged by Employee Attained Finality, Controlling Authority Cannot Set It Aside.

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the order of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which set aside th...