Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "vendor purchaser contract"

305 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Revision Petition and Rejects Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Based on Agreement to Sell Held Barred by Law as Agreement Does Not Create Interest in Property Under Section 54 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and Injunction Suit Without Declaration of Title Not Maintainable When Title Disputed.

16 Apr 2025

The appeal arose from a civil revision petition challenging the High Court's dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale Deed.

4 Aug 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of three agricultural properties. He claimed to have...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Tenancy Dispute, Upholding Protected Tenant's Ownership Rights. Oral Surrender of Protected Tenancy Rights Held Invalid Under Section 19 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950, and Occupancy Rights Granted in 1982 Annulled as Ownership Had Already Vested in Protected Tenant Under Section 38-E from 1973.

1 Oct 2021

The dispute concerned conflicting claims over agricultural land between the legal heirs of a purchaser and a protected tenant. The purchaser's predece...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Dispute for Patent Illegality and Perversity. The court found that the arbitrator's interpretation of a condition subsequent in a share purchase agreement was patently illegal and perverse, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Mar 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award arising from a share purchase agree...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Appeals Challenging Sale Deeds Executed in Favor of Members. Arbitrator under Delhi Cooperative Societies Act lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate validity of registered sale deeds, which can only be challenged before civil court.

30 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by Delhi Dayalbagh Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. against the orders of the Delhi High Court, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of No Joint Purchase Upheld. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Partition Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Joint Purchase of Suit Property in 1957.

23 Mar 2018

The case involves a property dispute between descendants of two brothers, Ramchandra Ingole and Trimbakrao Ingole, who had partitioned joint family pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Award Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Non-Consideration of Evidence. The court held that denial of cross-examination and failure to consider electronic evidence under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, 1872, renders an arbitral award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Apr 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator. The...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Impleading Application in Specific Performance Suit — Petitioner Entitled to be Heard Before Compromise Decree Affecting Her Rights. The court held that a person whose rights are directly affected by a compromise decree in a subsequent suit is a necessary and proper party under Order I Rule 10(2) CPC, and the trial court erred in rejecting the impleading application.

26 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Narayanamma, filed a suit for specific performance of contract (OS 2289/2007) against respondents 1 to 3 based on an agreement to...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Specific Performance of Development Agreement in Favor of Purchasers. Agreement for Development Treated as Agreement for Sale Under Specific Relief Act, 1963 as Essential Terms Constitute Sale of Immovable Property.

18 Jul 2012

The appellants, original defendants, were the owners of a property in Pune. They executed a development agreement dated 18th October 2007 in favor of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal heirs of Madhavrao Ramchandra More (appellants in SA/66/2003 an...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)