Search Results for "unreliable evidence"

2415 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2415 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Abduction and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Circumstance and Recovery of Body Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 364, 302, 420 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Umesh Tukaram Padwal and another against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which confirmed their con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Punjaram Gaikwad, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case No.72 of 2011 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction Under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom and Relied on Uncorroborated Extra-Judicial Confessions and Unreliable Dying Declaration.

The case pertains to the kidnapping and murder of one Suresh Kumar, a financier, on 19.08.2015. The deceased was last seen on that day and his dead bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal of Accused Convicted Under Section 302 IPC Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Set Aside as Motive, Last Seen, Recovery Evidence and Dog Tracking Held Unreliable, Failing to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances Pointing to Guilt.

This appeal arose from the conviction of the accused, a 24-year-old villager, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Chain. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 394, 201, 120(B) IPC and Section 135 Gujarat Police Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Parulben Mahendrabhai Godani, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat in Sessions Case No. 150/2016 for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative of deceased and testimony was inconsistent with medical evidence.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the appellants challenging their conviction under Sections 302, 307, 323, 504, 506 read with 34 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ravi Somanagouda Patil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of a person under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life impriso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and not supported by medical or other evidence.

The case arises from a common judgment of the Sessions Court convicting multiple accused for offences including murder, attempt to murder, and rioting...