Search Results for "suspicious recovery"

449 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 449 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in NDPS Case: Conviction for Possession of 900 gm Smack Upheld Despite Procedural Challenges. Chance recovery from vehicle under Section 43 NDPS Act does not require compliance with Section 50, and police testimony alone can sustain conviction.

The appellant, Kallu Khan, was convicted under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for possession...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal in Murder Case Involving Cyanide Poisoning of Wife in Hotel Room; Circumstantial Evidence and FSL Report Considered, but Final Verdict Not Included in Provided Excerpt

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant (accused No.1) by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mysuru, in S.C.No.305/2011 for t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits South African National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Sealing Procedures. Conviction under Sections 8(c), 21(c), 23, 28, 29 of NDPS Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove contraband was the same as seized.

The appellant, a South African national, was convicted by the Special Judge for NDPS Act cases for offences under Sections 8(c) read with Sections 21(...