Search Results for "substantial question of law"

980 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 980 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Suit for Possession Based on Title and Prior Possession Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Within 12 Years.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs (appellants) against the concurrent judgment and decree of the Trial Court and First Appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The appellant, Sri Bylamurthy, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the concurrent judgments ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Readiness and Willingness Upheld. Agreement to Sell dated 28.05.2012 for Rs.2,89,000/- with Rs.2,00,000/- Earnest Money Enforced as Plaintiff Proved Continuous Readiness and Willingness.

The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 28.05.2012, whereby the defendants-appellants agreed to s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for partition dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove joint family property and possession; no substantial question of law arose.

The present second appeal was filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) by the defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Joint Family Property and Possession Within Limitation.

The appellant, Sri N. Umesha, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the concurrent judgments of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Land Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The present appeals arise out of a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Injunction and Declaration Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Over Suit Property.

The appellant, Sri B.N. Devaraju, filed a second appeal before the Karnataka High Court against the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court Decree for Declaration and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Documentary Evidence and Failing to Frame Proper Points for Determination Under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC.

The appellant, Kum. Harshada S., filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree da...