Search Results for "subsidiary facts"

800 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 800 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal on Distribution of Company Assets in Liquidation. Holds that Secured Creditors Have Pari Passu Charge Only Over Properties Specifically Charged, Not All Assets; Workmen Have Priority for Uncharged Properties Under Sections 529 and 529A Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from the winding up of U.M.I. Special Steel Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. The company became sick, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Leave to Execute Consent Decree in Company Liquidation. Consent Decree Declared Void as Fraudulent Preference Under Section 446 of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the Company Judge refusing leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 to the appellant, Forbes & Company Lim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxation of Alleged Shortfall in Share Premium Under Transfer Pricing Provisions. The Dispute Centers on Whether Chapter X of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Can Apply When No Actual Income Arises from the International Transaction.

The petitioner, Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of a non-resident holding company, issued 2,89,224 equity shares at a pre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...