Search Results for "single workman"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "single workman"

593 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 593 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Labour Commissioner's Order Recognizing Protected Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Object to Union's Nominees Upheld Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Conciliation Officer Must Consider Employer's Objections and Pass Reasoned Order Under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

17 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited, is a registered company with a factory in Belur Industrial Area, Dharwad. Some of its employees are mem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Management's Appeal in Labour Dispute, Setting Aside Back Wages and Reinstatement Award Due to Workman's Non-Compliance. The Court held that the workman's failure to report for duty as directed by the High Court, despite offers of reinstatement, established disinterest in employment, warranting setting aside of the Labour Court's award under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

16 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a labour law case where the Management appealed against orders of the High Court and Labour Court. The Labour Court had awarded...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Workman's Appeal in Territorial Jurisdiction Dispute — Labour Court at Place of Employment and Termination Has Exclusive Jurisdiction. Merely Shifting Residence and Sending Demand Notice to Head Office Does Not Confer Jurisdiction Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

19 Apr 2022

The appellant, V G Jagdishan, was employed as a driver at the Ghaziabad office of M/s. Indofos Industries Limited. He worked at Ghaziabad and his serv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Labour Court Award Holding Accounts Supervisor Not a Workman Under Industrial Disputes Act — Failure to Consider Evidence and Decide All Issues Renders Award Perverse. The court held that mere nomenclature as 'accounts supervisor' is not conclusive and that the Labour Court must decide all issues, not just preliminary objections, under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Shri Damodar Mangueshkar, represented by the Cidade de Goa Hotel Employees Union, challenged the award dated 26.05.2010 passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Workman Status of General Manager (Research) in Industrial Disputes Act Case. The court held that the nature of duties performed by the employee, not the designation, determines workman status, and the respondent's work was primarily technical and clerical.

27 Jun 2014

The petitioner, M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research & Development Centre, a nonprofit scientific research organization, challenged an order of the Ind...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Contractual Workmen in BESCOM Case — Compensation Reduced to Rs.75,000 Each. Workmen Appointed on Contract Basis for Specific Period Held Entitled to Reinstatement with Continuity of Service but Without Backwages Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

20 Aug 2013

The case involves writ appeals filed against an order of a learned Single Judge who upheld the award of the Labour Court but directed payment of Rs.75...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Retrenchment Case. Termination of Probationer Without Notice or Compensation Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Employer Failed to Prove Unsatisfactory Work.

1 Sep 2006

The Petitioner, M/s R. Nawroji & Co., a partnership firm running a printing press, appointed the First Respondent, Francis E. Lobo, as a Machine Opera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Shipping Corporation of India in Seaman's Compensation Claim — Holds That Myocardial Infarction Is Not an 'Accident' Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court ruled that a heart attack suffered by a seaman while on board ship does not constitute an 'accident' arising out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, as there was no causal connection between the nature of work and the injury.

18 Nov 2005

The respondent, a seaman registered with the Seamen's Association, had worked for 22 years on various ships including those of the appellant, Shipping...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation in Lieu of Reinstatement for Workman Terminated on Loss of Confidence. Unfair Labour Practice Found Under Item 1(f) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

11 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Suresh Narbharam Kachalia, was a workman employed by M/s Shakti Insulated Wires Ltd. since 25 July 1963. After serving for nearly 23 y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

19 Jan 2005

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)