Search Results for "sexual intercourse"

873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Inconsistencies and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(m) IPC and Section 6 read with 5 of POCSO Act set aside as medical evidence contradicted prosecution story and testimony of victim and mother had contradictions.

The appellant, Rajesh S/o Rajan Nair, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada, for offences under Section 376(2)(m) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4 and 8 of POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Sexual Assault.

The appellant, Dadarao Gotiramji Khandare, was convicted by the Sessions Court, Amravati, under Sections 4 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Maroti s/o Domaji Sadmake, was convicted by the trial court under Section 376(1) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for allegedly raping a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010383542014_1

The appeal was filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment dated 12.06.2014 and order of sentence dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Forcible Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Maroti Dupare, was convicted by the 3rd District Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal and Sets Aside Divorce Decree in Adultery Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Interested Witnesses. Husband's Allegations of Wife's Illicit Relationship with Three Named Persons Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 13(1)(i) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife challenged the judgment of the Family Court, Akola, dated 17.06.2013, which granted a decree of divorce to the respondent-husband u...