Search Results for "semen"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Credibility and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Hiraman Jangu Uike, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Sections 376 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Material Contradictions and Improbable Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Testimony of Prosecutrix Lacks Corroboration and Medical Evidence Does Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Shrikant Sukhdeo Borkar, was convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 376, 323, and 342 IPC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape Case — Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Evidence Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal.

The State of Goa appealed against the acquittal of Rajendra Datta Zarekar under Sections 342 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 5 and 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, under Sections 5 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Father in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction Under Sections 376, 354, 323, 506 IPC Set Aside. Incestuous Rape Allegation Fails as Prosecutrix's Evidence is Unreliable and Contradictory, Benefit of Doubt Given to Appellant.

The appellant, Balu Bhausaheb Kothule, was convicted by the Sessions Court for offences under Sections 376, 354, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamlal s/o Punaram Achale, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial 139/2001 for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Contradictions and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ramprasad s/o Fagulal Amdare, was convicted by the Special Judge, POCSO Act, Nagpur, for offences under Section 6 read with Section 5(n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2), 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dasu s/o Kisan Waghmare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Majalgaon, in Special Case No. 14 of 2014 for offences under Sections 452,...