Search Results for "section 23(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "section 23(3)"

694 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 694 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Evacuee Property Dispute, Upholding Sale of Specified Area Under Displaced Persons Act. Property Transfer Limited to Area in Sale Certificate and Conveyance Deed, with Additional Areas Requiring Payment as per Chief Settlement Commissioner's Orders Under Section 24(1).

24 Jan 2024

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a property dispute concerning 'Spring Field', an evacuee property in Shimla. The appellants, legal heir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging FEMA Adjudication Orders for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Petitioners' challenge to show cause notices and adjudication orders under FEMA fails as writ petitions are not maintainable against mere show cause notices and are barred by delay and laches.

19 Nov 2022

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging show cause notices and adjudication order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification. Notification dated 27.08.2008 Under Karnataka Forest Act and Forest (Conservation) Act Challenged as Ultra Vires.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Numerous Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notifications and Demands. Petitioners Contend That the Notifications under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 are Ultra Vires the Constitution and Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case — Interim Injunction Set Aside Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case for trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 as the mark was originally owned by the joint venture company and the assignment was disputed.

28 Jul 2011

The case involves two appeals against a common judgment and order dated 23.12.2004 passed by the learned Single Judge in Notice of Motion No.553 of 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to DRT Presiding Officer's Appointment in Debt Recovery Case — Petitioner Failed to Establish Lack of Qualification Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Appointment of Presiding Officer with Judicial Experience as District Judge Upheld as Valid Under Section 5 of the Act.

31 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Tiger Jewellery India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the appointmen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 5 TADA for Possession of Weapon. Appellant Challenges Recovery Evidence and Disclosure Statement in Bombay Blast Case.

1 Jan 1970

...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)