Search Results for "review dismissed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "review dismissed"

5370 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5370 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Review Petition in Employees' Provident Fund Case — Limitation Period for Review Under Section 7B of EPF Act. The court held that if the last day for filing review falls on a holiday, the application filed on the next working day is within time, and directed the authority to consider the review on merits.

4 May 2005

The petitioners, M/s. Sincro Hotels Pvt. Ltd. and its Director Shri Kashyap Shinkre, challenged an order dated 30th December, 2004 passed by the Assis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Succession Dispute Between Two Wives — Second Wife's Marriage Void Due to Subsisting First Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court held that a second marriage during the subsistence of a first marriage is void ab initio, and the second wife is not a legal heir under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

13 Apr 2010

The case involves a dispute between two wives of Prakash Naik alias Vaingankar over his estate. Prakash married Deepa Naik on 17/03/1978, but the marr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Review Petition in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Second review petition not maintainable as it seeks re-agitation of issues already decided, and no grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC exist.

15 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Anand Prabhakar Joshi, a former employee of the Bank of Maharashtra, filed a second review petition before the Bombay High Court seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Setting Aside Review Order for Lack of Jurisdiction. The Appellate Court's Review of Its Own Judgment Was Without Jurisdiction as There Was No Error Apparent on the Face of the Record Under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

14 Jun 2013

The appellants, defendants in a suit for declaration and possession, challenged the judgment of the Senior Civil Judge, Sira, who allowed a review pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Application in Second Appeal for Failure to Frame Substantial Question of Law — Error Not Apparent on Record. Non-formulation of substantial question of law under Section 100(4) CPC is a procedural irregularity correctable in appeal, not review under Section 114 CPC.

23 Dec 2014

The applicants, Park View Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. and Vinayak Narayan Ghatate, were the respondents in Second Appeal No.110/2011 before the B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Against Review Order in Service Dispute — Earlier Dismissal of SLP Against Main Judgment Renders Challenge to Review Order Non-Maintainable. The Court held that a special leave petition challenging only the order rejecting a review petition is not maintainable when the main judgment of the High Court has already been unsuccessfully challenged and is not under challenge.

5 Oct 2020

The petitioner, T.K. David, was an employee of Kuruppampady Service Co-operative Bank. He was suspended and a disciplinary inquiry was conducted, resu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Environmental Mining Dispute Due to Excessive Delay and Lack of Merit. Petitions Filed by State and Company After Retirement of Original Bench Judges Violate Procedural Timelines Under Order XLVII Rule 2 of Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and Fail to Show Cogent Grounds for Review.

9 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India dealt with multiple review petitions filed by the State of Goa and Vedanta Limited (formerly known as Sesa Sterlite Ltd.) a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Review Order Directing Re-evaluation of Judicial Service Examination Answer Scripts. Re-evaluation Cannot Be Ordered in Absence of Statutory Provision or Demonstrated Material Error.

6 Feb 2019

The appeal arose from an order of the Gauhati High Court allowing a review petition filed by the first respondent, a candidate in the Tripura Judicial...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Patent Refusal for Lack of Inventive Step and Enablement. Controller's order upheld as amended claims were not enabled and lacked inventive step under Patents Act, 1970.

29 Jan 2025

The appellant, Caleb Suresh Motupalli, filed a patent application for an invention titled 'Necktie Persona-Extender/Environment-integrator and method ...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)