Search Results for "reasonable surplus"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "reasonable surplus"

217 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 217 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit by Tamil Nadu Against Karnataka Over Pennaiyar River Water Dispute — Maintainability Barred Under Article 262 and Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956. Court Holds That Disputes Relating to Inter-State River Waters Are Exclusively Triable by a Tribunal Under the ISWD Act, 1956, and Not by the Supreme Court Under Article 131.

14 Nov 2019

The State of Tamil Nadu filed Original Suit No. 1 of 2018 under Article 131 of the Constitution of India against the State of Karnataka and the Union ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pre-emption Case Under West Bengal Land Reforms Act — Full Consideration Must Be Deposited at Time of Filing Application. The Court held that the pre-emptor must deposit the entire consideration as per the sale deed, not a self-assessed amount, and failure to do so renders the application invalid.

17 Oct 2019

The case involves a dispute over the right of pre-emption under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. The appellants purchased a plot of land from t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

31 Mar 2017

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Assignment of Assets by Ex-Director Void Under Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 — Post-Winding Up Sale Without Court Leave Invalid. The court held that any disposition of company property after winding up without court approval is void, and subrogation does not permit sale of assets without leave of the court.

21 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two reports filed by the Official Liquidator seeking a declaration that a Deed of Assignment dated 14.03.2012 executed by Mr. Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Trade Circulars Restricting CST Exemption to Registered Dealers. State Government Cannot Grant Exemption for Inter-State Sales to Unregistered Dealers Under Section 8(5) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 After 2002 Amendment.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Prism Cement Limited and its shareholder/director, filed a writ petition challenging three trade circulars issued by the Commissioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging HRA Entitlement for Ordnance Factory Employees Who Built Own Houses. Employees who constructed own houses without obtaining non-availability certificate are not entitled to House Rent Allowance under applicable rules.

26 Sep 2011

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Defence and Ordnance Factory Board, filed a writ petition challenging the entitlement of certain employees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice in Ceiling Act Case. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 16 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Kondabai, as legal heir of deceased Gangubai Kadam, challenged a notice dated 23.06.1992 issued by the Additional Commissioner, Aurang...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)