Search Results for "radiologist"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(1), 341, 506, 109 IPC and Sections 4, 12, 17 POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Kisan Damaji Naik and Ramesh Abidas Vasave, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nandurbar, in Sessions Case No. 01/2018 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in Family Assault Case — Conviction Under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC Upheld. Acquittal by Trial Court Set Aside by Appellate Court; Revision Petitions Challenging Conviction Dismissed as Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With.

The case arises from a family dispute between two brothers, Chandrakanth and Neelkant, and their respective family members. The complainant, Smt. Iram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal Dismissed: Court Upholds 10-Year Imprisonment for Sexual Assault of a Minor. The Bombay High Court affirms the conviction under IPC and POCSO Act, dismissing the appellant's claims of false implication and procedural lapses.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an appeal challenging a 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the allegations.

The appellant, Narayana Swamy, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chikkaballapura (sitting at Chintamani) in Spl.S.C.No.3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction and Life Sentence of Accused in Quadruple Murder Case Under IPC and Arms Act. Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony of Injured Survivor and Recovery of Incriminating Articles, with Death Penalty Enhancement Denied as Case Not Rarest of Rare.

The Supreme Court dealt with criminal appeals arising from a gruesome murder case where four family members were killed and one injured. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals Against Acquittal in Kidnapping and Rape Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Victim's Testimony Found Unreliable and Contradictory, Leading to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 366A, 365, 376, 114 r/w 34 IPC.

The case arises from an incident where the complainant, Hanmanth, alleged that his minor daughter was kidnapped and raped by the accused, Mallikarjun ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age. Conviction under Sections 366 and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abhang s/o Laximan Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for offences under Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Age Determination. Conviction under Section 6 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC set aside as victim's age not proved beyond reasonable doubt and medical evidence inconsistent with alleged rape.

The appellant, Manikanta @ Puli, was convicted by the I Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Chikkamagaluru, in Spl.C.(PCSOA) No.10/2017 for o...