Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

521 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case for Possession of Commercial Quantity of Charas — Rejects Argument That Quantity Must Be Weighed After Excluding Packing Material. The court held that the weight of the contraband substance for determining commercial quantity under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act is the weight of the substance itself, and the prosecution is not required to exclude packing material.

12 Aug 2011

The appellant, Nandlal Shyamdas, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS Court, Mapusa, for an offence under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Russian National in NDPS Case Due to Procedural Violations and Unreliable Evidence. Conviction Overturned for Non-Compliance with Search Procedures and Doubtful Arrest Timing

30 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court acquitted Appellant, a Russian national, who was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 for posses...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Where Charas Quantity Was Less Than Commercial Quantity, Section 37 Rigours Not Attracted. The court held that 1000 gms of charas is commercial quantity under Section 2(viia) read with notification S.O. 1055(E), but granted bail due to prolonged custody and no prior offences.

16 Oct 2023

The applicant, Vikas Babarsingh Itkan, filed a bail application under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for offences...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) — Conviction for Possession of Charas Set Aside as Search and Seizure Vitiated by Failure to Transmit Information to Immediate Official Superior.

16 Apr 2019

The appellants, Daulatram @Dolly Trilok Singh, Shahmohammed Salatmatmiya Shah, and Bampada @Bamdeo @Ity Sanatan Adak, were convicted by the Special Ju...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case but Reduces Sentence — Recovery of 13 Kg Charas from Dhaba Counter. Conscious possession established as appellant was managing the dhaba and contraband found below counter; sentence reduced from 15 to 10 years considering age and first offence.

15 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Jeet Ram against his conviction under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, 1985 set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and failure to inform accused of right to be searched before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer.

10 Jul 2015

The appellants, original accused Nos.1, 4, and 5, were convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur in Special Case No.24 of 2007 for an offence punishable...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in NDPS Act Case for Smuggling Heroin in Suitcases. Circumstantial Evidence Including Possession of Keys, Baggage Tags, and Concealment of Contraband Sufficient to Prove Conscious Possession Under Section 21(c) of NDPS Act, 1985.

19 Dec 2011

The appellant, Mrs. Agnes Ruddy Odhoch, a Kenyan national, was convicted by the Special Judge, Greater Mumbai, for offences under Sections 21(c), 23(c...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in PIT-NDPS Case for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Detention under Section 3 of PIT-NDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @Center Dhirubhai Rathod, through his wife Pintuben Sanjaybhai Rathod, challenged the preventive detention order dated 06.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court (Goa Bench) Upholds Conviction of Accused in NDPS Case for Possession of 1.15 kg Charas — Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act Not Required as Recovery Was from Bag, Not Person.

3 Feb 2005

The appellant, Mohammad Asraf Koloo, was convicted by the Special Judge, Goa, under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 and Delay in Trial. Personal Search of Accused Conducted Without Informing Right to Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, Violating Mandatory Safeguard Under Section 50 of NDPS Act.

15 Oct 2025

The applicant, Arshad Karar Khan, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking regular ba...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)