Search Results for "prosecutrix statement"

279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction Under Sections 363, 376, 506, 342 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Relied on Unreliable Sole Testimony.

The case involves an appeal against conviction for offences under Sections 363, 376, 506 and 342 IPC. The appellant, Dada Laxman Gaikwad, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Age Evidence and Consent. Prosecutrix's Age Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Benefit of Doubt Given to Accused Under Sections 363, 366-A, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Sanjay Jagannath Ursal, was convicted by the IV Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur on June 30, 2003 in Sessions Case No.210 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Gang Rape, Criminal Trespass, and Criminal Intimidation — Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical and Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(g), 448, 506(II) read with Section 34 IPC confirmed.

The case arises from an incident during the intervening night of 27/08/1991 and 28/08/1991 at about 1:00 a.m., when the appellants Dinesh Tukaram Tela...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Pratik, Sudesh, Prithviraj, Munna, and Chhotu against their convictions by the Assistant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape and Atrocities Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act Upheld.

The appellant, Ramdas alias Ramkisan s/o Nagnath Hulgunde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 376, 452, 323, 506 of the Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Evidence of Promise to Marry. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i)(n) IPC and POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix was a consenting minor and no false promise of marriage established.

The appellant, Prashant Ramchandra Kasarkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Yavatmal in Special (POCSO) Case 63/2017 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Gang Rape Under Section 376(2)(c) IPC — Acquittal of Other Accused and Lesser Offences Upheld. Appellant's Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence, No Interference Warranted.

The case involves an appeal by accused No.1, Vasant Mahadeo Powar, against his conviction under Section 376(2)(c) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...