Search Results for "pension recovery"

275 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 275 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Tribunal Order on Pay Protection for Regularized Employees. Pay Fixation Directed Afresh with Protection of Last Pay Drawn, but Seniority and Other Benefits Denied.

The petitioners, Anil D. Kagathara and another, were initially engaged as casual labourers with the respondent department and were later regularized. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Pay Protection in Regularization Case — Tribunal's Order Modified to Protect Last Pay Drawn. Pay Fixation Must Consider Last Pay Drawn Before Regularization Under Service Law Principles.

The petitioners, originally engaged as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized in service. They filed Original Application No.11...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petitions Challenging CAT Order on Pay Fixation for Regularized Employees. Court holds that last pay drawn before regularization must be protected and seniority must be counted from initial appointment as casual labourers.

The petitioners, who were initially appointed as casual labourers in the Department of Posts, were regularized after several years. They filed Origina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Petition Challenging Pension Recovery from Deceased Employee's Pension. Recovery set aside for lack of departmental enquiry and being time-barred under Rule 27 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982.

The petitioners, widow and son of a deceased employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged an order dated 3.10.2001 by which the respondents deducted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Transfer of Employees from Municipal Corporation to State Government. Transfer of employees under Section 451 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 held valid as in public interest and for better administration.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by employees of the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) challenging their transfer to the Sta...