Search Results for "payee's bank account"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "payee's bank account"

359 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 359 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused. Borrowing of Rs.20,000/- and Issuance of Cheque Established; Acquittal Set Aside.

17 Jan 2023

The appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Sagar dated 26.08.2011 in C.C.No.124/2010 wherei...

High Court

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Failure to Prove Legal Enforceability of Debt. The Court Found That Presumption Under Section 139 Did Not Extend to Legal Liability as Complainant Could Not Prove Partnership Profits Through Profit and Loss Account or Balance Sheet.

17 Jan 2019

This was a criminal appeal filed by the complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the judgment of acquittal passed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonoured Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Restoring Complaint for Trial. The Court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Act regarding legally enforceable debt is rebuttable only at trial, not at pre-trial stage, and the basic ingredients under Section 138 were prima facie satisfied.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the appellant against the second respondent, wh...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's inconsistent evidence and lack of financial capacity led to upholding of acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 Jul 2019

The appellant, Vikas Gopi Bhagat, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Acquittal Set Aside Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Dishonour of Cheque for Investment in Business Partnership Attracts Section 138 NI Act Liability Despite Dispute Over Debt Legality.

10 Sep 2012

The appellant, Sheikh Shabbir, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, acquitting the res...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

1 Jun 2022

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. Failure to Prove Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Leads to Quashing of Complaint.

10 Feb 2026

The applicants, Chetan Sunderji Bhanushali, Pravin Girish Chamaria, and Ashapura Edifice Pvt. Ltd., filed two criminal applications under Section 482 ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Based on Promissory Note — Discrepancies in Plaintiff's Evidence and Failure to Prove Execution Lead to Dismissal of Suit. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to discharge the initial burden of proving the execution of the promissory note and the consideration, and the discrepancies in the plaintiff's evidence created doubt about the genuineness of the loan transaction.

29 Jun 2026

The appeal arises from a suit for recovery of money filed by the plaintiff, a money lender, against the defendants based on a promissory note dated 05...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons in Cheque Dishonour Cases for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Magistrate at Mumbai had no jurisdiction as no part of cause of action arose within its territorial limits under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

4 May 2011

The Bombay High Court considered a group of applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of process issued...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Locus Standi — Complainant Not Proprietor or Holder in Due Course. The court held that a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, must be filed by the holder in due course or the authorized power of attorney holder, and the appellant, who falsely claimed to be the proprietor, had no locus standi.

19 Sep 2013

The appellant, Upendra Devendra Lad, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against the respondents, including M...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)