Search Results for "patta appeal"

173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Remits Encroachment Appeal for Fresh Adjudication After Withdrawal of Earlier Appeal — Cart Track Encroachment Cannot Be Claimed as Patta Land Right Under Revenue Standing Order 26(15) and Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905.

The petitioner, M.Shanthi, filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings of the District Collector, Tiruvannamalai, dated 05.01.2026, which confir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitioner Seeking Mandamus for Land Survey and Demarcation. Pendency of Second Appeal Without Interim Order Does Not Justify Delay in Conducting Survey Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

The case involved a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Rajalakshmi seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsild...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remits Pre-Partition Tenants' Claim to High Court in Land Dispute with State of Telangana. The Court held that the earlier judgment in Ramesh Parsram Malani did not examine the tenants' claim, and the High Court must decide the writ petitions afresh.

The Supreme Court of India disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from a common order of the High Court of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh dated 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Zamindari Abolition Land Rights Case — Grassland Not Khudkasht. Land Recorded as 'Bir' (Grass) Before Vesting Cannot Be Treated as Khudkasht Under Section 4(2) of M.B. Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the judgment of the High Court which had decreed the suit in favor o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Tenancy Dispute — Section 32M Certificate Conclusive Proof of Ownership. Certificate issued under Section 32M of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is conclusive evidence of tenant's purchase and civil court cannot ignore it.

The appellant, Pushpalata Narayan Thorbole, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree dated 1.4.2014 passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 14...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside Due to Perverse Findings on Adverse Possession. Burden of Proof for Adverse Possession Lies on Claimant; Mere Long Possession Insufficient Under Section 100 CPC.

The present appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a judgment and decree dated 2.6.2007 passed by the Civil Judge ...