Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "neighbouring land owners"
82 result(s) found
Found 82 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Due to Non-Compliance with Remand Order. First Appellate Court Failed to Appoint Commissioner to Measure Property as Per Sale Deeds, Vitiating Its Judgment.
20 Jan 2025The case involves a property dispute where the plaintiff originally filed a suit for declaration, permanent injunction, and mandatory injunction. The ...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Alleging Illegal Construction and Environmental Violations in Navelim — No Specific Violation of Law Found. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish any illegality in the constructions or environmental violations, and the authorities were taking adequate steps.
16 Dec 2020The petitioners, Navelim Civic & Consumer Forum and six residents, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa alleging ill...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act for Violation of Natural Justice — Notice Issued Without Prior Hearing and Without Proper Application of Mind. The court held that a demolition notice under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, must be preceded by a proper inquiry and an opportunity of hearing to the affected persons.
9 Jul 2019The petitioners, residents of SmitDeep Apartment in Mumbai, challenged a notice dated 28 September 2015 issued under Section 354 of the Mumbai Municip...
- 136
High Court
Bombay High Court Issues Directions in Suo Motu PIL on Building Collapse in Nagpur. Court emphasizes strict compliance with Development Control Rules and accountability of planning authorities.
3 Jul 2017The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, took suo motu cognizance of a news item published in 'The Hitwada' dated 19.12.2006 regarding the collapse of a n...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.
28 Jul 2016The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Motor Vehicles for Tax Arrears — Held That Procedure Under Section 8 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Must Be Followed Before Detention. The court quashed the seizure of vehicles by the respondents for non-compliance with mandatory notice and hearing requirements under Section 8 of the Act.
10 Mar 2016The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the seizure and detention of m...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Alleged Caste-Based Insult Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Court upholds acquittal as evidence failed to establish that the accused insulted the complainant with intent to humiliate on caste basis under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
29 Nov 2011The revision application was filed by Sitaram Mahadu Dhadve, the original first informant, challenging the judgment and order dated 17th September 200...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal Against Inadequacy of Sentence in SC/ST Atrocity Case — Minimum Sentence of Six Months Imprisonment Mandatory. Accused convicted under Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 for caste-based abuse and assault; trial court's sentence of only fine set aside and enhanced to six months rigorous imprisonment.
20 Dec 2006The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the inadequacy of sentence imposed by the ...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...
- 107
