Search Results for "liberal interpretation"

367 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Due to Invalid Service of Summons. Service by affixture without prior attempt at personal service held invalid under Order V Rule 17 CPC, and ex-parte decree set aside under Order IX Rule 13 CPC.

The appellant, M/s Arjun Travels, a sole proprietorship concern, was the owner of a vehicle involved in a motor accident. The respondents, being the l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Grandfather's Appeal to Cancel Gift Deed Under Senior Citizens Act — Gift Deed Without Condition to Provide Basic Amenities Cannot Be Cancelled Under Section 23(1) of Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

The appellant, M. Rajapandian, is the grandfather of the first respondent, a minor represented by his father R. Veemarajan. The appellant executed a g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Grandfather's Appeal Seeking Cancellation of Gift Deed Under Senior Citizens Act. Gift Deed Without Condition to Provide Basic Amenities Cannot Be Cancelled Under Section 23(1) of Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

The appellant, M. Rajapandian, is the grandfather of the first respondent, a minor represented by his father R. Veemarajan. The appellant executed a g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Senior Citizens' Maintenance Case — Gift Deed Set Aside for Failure to Provide Basic Amenities. Section 23 of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 interpreted liberally to protect senior citizens' rights.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which set aside the orders of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and the Sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...