Search Results for "land records correction"

314 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 314 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Revision Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry After 14 Years — State's Petition Dismissed. Suo Motu Revision Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Held Invalid for Lack of Notice and Unreasonable Delay.

The case involves four writ petitions filed against an order dated 22.09.2010 passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru District, in procee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Consolidation Scheme Orders -- Petitioner's 38-Year Delayed Application for Rectification Rejected -- State Minister's Order Upheld

The petitioner challenged orders dated 09 July 2015 and 15 July 2014 related to a land consolidation scheme implemented in 1974 -- The petitioner clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Land Revenue Act Case — No Prima Facie Case for Abetment of Misappropriation. Section 192-A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 requires specific allegations of abetment; mere official duty performance does not attract criminal liability.

The judgment concerns four criminal petitions and a writ petition filed by government officials seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.18/2014 registered...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree in Favor of Forest Department in Suit for Declaration and Correction of Survey Records. Court Holds That Appellants Failed to Prove Title Over Disputed Land and That Government's Claim Based on Survey Records Was Correct.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment of the Ad-hoc District Judge-2, South Goa, Margao, in Civil Suit No. 4/2007 d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises from Correction of Clerical Error in 7/12 Extract.

The petitioners filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, which confirmed a mutati...