Search Results for "judgment writer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "judgment writer"

231 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 231 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal of Dismissed Sub-Registrar in Disciplinary Matter — Upholds Single Judge's Refusal to Reappreciate Evidence in Judicial Review. The court held that findings of the Enquiry Officer based on evidence, including hearsay, are not perverse and punishment of dismissal for corruption is proportionate.

30 Jan 2026

The appellant, S. Packiam, a Sub-Registrar in the Office of the District Registrar, North Chennai, was dismissed from service following a disciplinary...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was declared hostile and no independent corroboration of demand and acceptance of bribe.

23 Feb 2024

The appellant, Shrikant Chimaji Jahagirdar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

31 Aug 2023

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Activist in UAPA Case for Failure to File Charge Sheet Within 90 Days. The court held that the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC is indefeasible and the period of house arrest cannot be excluded from the computation of the 90-day period.

8 Feb 2021

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, a 69-year-old scholar, writer, and civil rights activist, was arrested on 28/10/2018 in connection with FIR No. 4 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Finding of Negligence and Inadequate Compensation. Deceased pedestrian hit by auto rickshaw; court held that the driver was negligent and enhanced compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

4 Jul 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Arjun Bhalekar, who died in a vehicular accident on 29.9.2010. The deceased wa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Incorrect Income Calculation and Negligence in Awarding Future Prospects. Deceased pedestrian earning Rs.4,500 per month as a labourer; court applies multiplier of 13 and adds 40% future prospects, setting aside Tribunal's award of Rs.3,60,000 and enhancing to Rs.6,72,000.

4 Jul 2017

The appellants, being the legal heirs of deceased Arjun Bhalekar, filed an appeal against the judgment and award dated 2.5.2013 passed by the Motor Ac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Zee Entertainment for Misuse of Confidential TV Show Concept and Copyright Infringement. Plaintiffs established prima facie case of breach of confidence and copyright infringement in concept note for 'Badki Bahu' serial.

25 Mar 2015

The plaintiffs, Beyond Dreams Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, filed a suit against Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. and another for preve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case - Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Setting Wife on Fire Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence.

24 Nov 2014

The appellant, Kakasaheb Mohiniraj Khatik, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Bebi, and senten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Suit for Specific Performance in Property Dispute — Petitioner Permitted to Delete Defendants Who Sold Their Share During Pendency. Agreement dated 20.10.1982 disputed as forged by respondents; court permits deletion of defendants who executed sale deeds during suit.

19 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Srikant Balwant Nalawade, filed Regular Civil Suit No.92 of 2007 before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jaisingpur, seeking specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act — Acknowledgment Letters Do Not Extend Limitation Beyond Three Years. The court held that a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 must be filed within three years from the last acknowledgment of debt; otherwise, it is barred by limitation.

2 Mar 2006

The petitioner, Uma Kumar, proprietor of Kandhan Electricals & Engineers, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act,...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)