Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Co-owner Property Dispute — Holds That Possession of Co-owner Is Not Adverse Without Ouster. The court ruled that the burden of proving ouster lies on the party claiming adverse possession, and the suit for declaration and possession was within limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
29 Oct 2015The case involves a property dispute among co-owners. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and possession of agr...




