Search Results for "gratification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "gratification"

483 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's Failure to Support Prosecution Case and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Confirmation of Acquittal Under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Death of Respondents. Acquittal of Public Servants under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 upheld as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

17 Mar 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 20.11...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Sanction. Decoy Trap Found Vitiated as Panch Witnesses Were Police Employees and Sanction for Prosecution Was Not Obtained Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

5 Feb 2026

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

22 Feb 2024

The appellant, Bhaurao s/o Raghoji Ingole, a retired headmaster, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No.2/2002 for offences und...

High Court

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole interested witness's testimony was not corroborated and recovery of tainted money was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

30 Aug 2023

The appellant, Babarao Shyamrao Vitalkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No.5/1996 for offences under Section 7 and Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

20 Mar 2023

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Sub-Registrar in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Proven Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. The court found that the prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt the demand of Rs.500 as gratification and the acceptance during a trap, under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute involved a criminal appeal against the conviction of a Sub-Registrar under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, holding ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Summons Under Section 319 CrPC for Lack of Sufficient Evidence Against Applicant in Corruption Case. The court held that the power to summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC requires a higher standard of proof and cannot be exercised based on mere suspicion or vague allegations.

22 Feb 2023

The applicant, Rupa Deepak Dhande, filed an application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order dated 06.01.2022 passed by the learned Special Ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

12 Jul 2019

The appellant, Mahesh Ramesh Jadhav, was convicted by the Special Judge, Amalner, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corr...

6 7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)