Search Results for "foreign arbitration award"

233 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 233 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Neutral Arbitrator in Railway and Airport Authority Contracts — Unilateral Appointment Clause Invalid. Arbitration clause providing for appointment by General Manager or officer of the same entity violates Section 12(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns three matters: two arbitration applications and one arbitration petition, all raising a common question about the validity of ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Power Solutions Company and Electricity Supply Company. Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allowed due to failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator as per clause 4.1 of contract agreement dated 28.03.2018.

The petitioner, M/s Nsure Reliable Power Solutions Pvt Ltd, a private limited company engaged in infrastructure business, participated in a tender flo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Award Holder Against Award Debtor. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Non-Compliance, Incapacity, Natural Justice, and Public Policy.

The case concerns the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 17th January, 2011 passed in London, UK, in favor of Vitol S.A. (the award holder)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition in International Commercial Arbitration with Foreign Seat. Court holds that Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 does not apply where seat of arbitration is outside India, and no interim relief can be granted under Section 9.

The petitioner, BG Strategic Advisors, LLC, a Florida corporation, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...