Search Results for "forcible possession"

288 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Lack of Locus Standi in Eviction Suit — Identity of Appellant Remains Unresolved. The court found that the appellant failed to establish his identity and locus standi to challenge the eviction decree.

The appeal arose from an eviction suit filed by the respondents against the appellant. The appellant claimed to be in possession of a room and sought ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Leave and License Agreement Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Existence of Arbitration Clause and Disputes Justify Appointment, Leaving Issues of Limitation and Validity to Arbitrator.

The applicant, Bafna Motors Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction on Ground of Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Dispute Under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

The case involves an appeal filed by Zuberahmed Maqbool Ansari (original Defendant No.2) against an ad-interim order dated 24.09.2020 passed by a lear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Orders in Testamentary Suit Under Section 268 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Court holds that Section 141 CPC confers power to protect estate property pending grant of letters of administration.

The Plaintiff, Rupali Mehta, filed Petition No.378 of 2005 seeking letters of administration with the Will annexed in respect of the estate of Captain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenancy Declaration Petition Due to Lack of Evidence of Cultivation and Payment of Rent. Petitioners failed to prove they were tenants under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The case involves a writ petition filed by several individuals (the petitioners) challenging the judgment and order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...