Search Results for "executable decree"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Obstructionists in Execution of Possession Decree — Upholds Order for Removal of Obstruction Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. Decree for possession passed in 1964 suit; obstructionists claiming independent title failed to prove possession prior to decree.

The appeal arose from an order in Chamber Summons No. 597 of 1996 in B.C.C.C. Suit No. 2056 of 1964, decided by the City Civil Court on 24.4.1998. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings - Limited Inquiry Under Order 21 Rule 101 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Conduct Full-Fledged Trial When Obstruction is Ex Facie Baseless; Summary Rejection Permissible.

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of inquiry to be conducted by an Executing Court under Order 21 Rule 101 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Permanent Injunction Decree Against Legal Representatives. Decree for Permanent Injunction Binds Legal Representatives of Deceased Judgment-Debtor Under Section 50 CPC and Order 21 Rule 32 CPC.

The petitioners, widow and children of Divira Bolu, challenged the orders passed by the II Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, in Execution Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Judgment-Debtor's Petition Seeking Rescission of Contract Under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act — Decree-Holder's Failure to Deposit Balance Consideration Within Stipulated Time Gives Right to Rescission, Subsequent Deposit Does Not Extinguish That Right.

The petitioner, T.L. Rajagopal, was the defendant/judgment-debtor in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 16.08.1997 filed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Execution of Compromise Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Jurisdiction Objection Waived by Consent Decree. Clause 22 of Agreement Conferring Jurisdiction on Pune Courts Held Binding Despite Property Location in Satara.

The applicant, M/s. Indrayani Foods Ltd., entered into an agreement to sell two properties in Satara district to the respondent, PamPac Machines Pvt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Against Execution of Decree for Possession, Holding That Objectors Claiming Adverse Possession Must First Establish Their Own Independent Title. Order XXI Rule 97 CPC Objections Cannot Be Used to Re-litigate Title Already Decided Against the Judgment Debtor.

The present appeals arise from execution proceedings initiated by the decree holder (respondent No. 1) to enforce a decree for possession of land adme...