Search Results for "examination-in-chief"

462 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection in Murder Conviction Appeals — Joint Trial of Two Sessions Cases Upheld. No Prejudice Found in Common Judgment Under Section 374(2) CrPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment dated 30.03.2016 in Sessions Trial Nos. 144/2012 and 233/2014. The appellants we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Continuity and Back Wages for 19 Workmen. Workmen's Writ Petition for Full Back Wages Allowed in Part, Reducing Back Wages to 50%.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a common award of the Labour Court, Aurangabad, in Reference (IDA) No. 10/2012. The first petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Akhtar s/o Abaskhan Pathan, was charged with offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Unsigned MOU for Flat Purchase. Contract Not Concluded as Essential Terms Were Not Finalized and MOU Remained Unsigned.

The plaintiffs, Rohit A. Kapadia and Sandhya R. Kapadia, filed a suit against the defendant, Perviz J. Modi, seeking specific performance of an allege...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in MSRTC Cash Robbery Case. Evidence of Injured Employees and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Robbery and Hurt Under Sections 394 and 332 IPC.

The applicant, Suresh Ananda Lohar, along with another accused Jagannath Shenekar, was prosecuted for offences under Sections 394 (robbery) and 332 (v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Ground of Cruelty and Dismisses Wife's Appeal for Restitution of Conjugal Rights. False criminal complaints by wife constitute mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The case involves cross-appeals arising from a common judgment of the Family Court, Nagpur, dated 15-4-2009. The husband, Manoj Pate, filed First Appe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Subhash Govinda Ambhore and Gajanan Pandhari Chibhade, were convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 376(2)(g) (gang ra...